As Kenny Plummer continues to assert political influence in Mount Vernon—promoting candidates, guiding campaign decisions, and positioning himself as a leader in the city’s political future—newly obtained documents raise serious questions about the financial interests that may be shaping, or benefiting from, his involvement. What began as public concern over his role in the controversial Rise Up Mount Vernon PAC has evolved into a broader examination of possible conflicts of interest, undisclosed financial obligations, and ethical concerns that merit closer scrutiny. At the center of this controversy is a fourth-floor condominium on Nosband Avenue in White Plains, New York—and a mortgage agreement with PMP Lending LLC, a company affiliated with a real estate development firm based in New Rochelle.
For the people of Mount Vernon, understanding who is behind the money, messaging, and political maneuvers is essential. If Mr. Plummer seeks to play a central role in shaping the city’s leadership, residents deserve full transparency—not just about the candidates he supports, but about the financial and political networks that may be influencing those choices. Where there is power and influence, there must also be accountability.
What the Documents Reveal
1. Confirmed Mortgage with PMP Lending LLC
A Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Financing Statement filed with the Westchester County Clerk confirms that Kenny Plummer and a co-debtor entered into a mortgage agreement with PMP Lending LLC. The agreement provides the lender with a broad secured interest in the property, including not only the real estate itself but also associated fixtures, appliances, rental income, leases, insurance proceeds, eminent domain claims, and contracts for maintenance or renovation. Such comprehensive mortgage terms are common in commercial lending and indicate a significant financial relationship between the borrower and lender.
Given that the mortgaged property is located in White Plains and that PMP Lending is affiliated with a real estate development firm in New Rochelle, this arrangement raises important public interest questions—particularly in light of Plummer’s political role in Mount Vernon. Residents may reasonably ask: Why is a politically active figure with confirmed financial obligations tied to properties outside of Mount Vernon so heavily involved in shaping the city’s political landscape? What influence, if any, do these financial relationships have on campaign activity, endorsements, or policy advocacy?
These questions speak to a broader concern about transparency and accountability in local governance. While there is no evidence that the mortgage itself is improper or illegal, it underscores the need for political figures to clearly disclose financial ties that may intersect with public responsibilities—particularly when those ties involve entities that could have an interest in municipal decisions
Who Is PMP Lending LLC—and Why It Matters
PMP Lending LLC is not only a lender but is also affiliated with a real estate development firm based in New Rochelle, New York. This dual role—financial institution and developer—raises reasonable questions about how financial and political interests may intersect, particularly when connected to individuals involved in public political activity.
In Westchester County, developers from cities like New Rochelle have historically expressed interest in expanding their influence into neighboring municipalities such as Mount Vernon. In this context, any financial relationship between a politically active figure and a development-linked entity in a neighboring city warrants careful public scrutiny. While there is no evidence of wrongdoing, the potential for perceived conflicts of interest exists—especially if the developer-lender could benefit from decisions related to land use, zoning, or contracts influenced by political actors.
The mortgage between Kenny Plummer and PMP Lending LLC goes beyond a typical financial transaction, as it includes control over property-related income streams and contractual arrangements. When considered alongside Plummer’s involvement in local political endorsements and campaign financing, this financial relationship raises legitimate questions about transparency and the balance of influence in Mount Vernon’s decision-making process.
At the time of publication, a request for comment was sent to PMP Lending LLC representative William O’Connor. No response has been received.
Even more troubling is the question of whether Kenny Plummer was ever legally eligible to serve as District Leader in the first place. Under New York Election Law § 6-122, candidates for party positions—such as District Leader—must be bona fide residents of the Assembly district they seek to represent. This requirement is not symbolic—it’s a legal mandate to ensure local leadership reflects the will of the people actually living in the district.
By his own admission, Plummer splits his time between White Plains and Mount Vernon. And while he may have held a lease or utility bill in Mount Vernon, that alone does not establish legal residency or domicile. In New York, domicile is defined by where a person actually lives with the intent to remain. Simply put, it doesn’t matter if your name is on a lease or if the lights are on in an apartment—if it’s not your true, permanent home, it doesn’t meet the standard.
This apparent violation of the residency requirement not only undermines the integrity of his position, but it also suggests Plummer misled both the party and the public. Ultimately, the legal and ethical pressure surrounding this issue forced him to resign, casting a shadow over the political judgment of those who allowed it to happen in the first place
2. Federal Tax Liens Totaling Over $69,000
Public records from the Internal Revenue Service’s Small Business/Self-Employed Division show that two federal tax liens have been filed in Kenny Plummer’s name: one totaling $45,016.47 for income taxes reportedly owed from 2016 and 2017, and another for $23,852.38 related to 2013. These liens, which appear to remain active, apply to all property and assets associated with Plummer. While the existence of tax liens does not imply criminal wrongdoing, they raise legitimate questions about financial transparency—particularly given his active role in political endorsements and campaign operations. It is unclear whether these liabilities have been disclosed to political committees or party leadership, a matter that may warrant further review under applicable ethics or disclosure requirements.
3. Power of Attorney on File
Title documents include a Unit Owner’s Power of Attorney signed by Kenny Plummer, authorizing the condominium board and its affiliated developer to act on his behalf in matters related to the property’s transfer, leasing, or legal management. While such an arrangement is not unusual and is not illegal, its existence is noteworthy given Plummer’s political activity in Mount Vernon. If any individuals or entities connected to the condominium’s development also have business or political interests in Mount Vernon, the relationship could warrant closer public scrutiny to ensure transparency and avoid any perceived conflicts of interest.
What the Documents Reveal
A Pattern of Political Gain Amid Public Decline
Since Kenny Plummer’s emergence as a behind-the-scenes powerbroker in Mount Vernon politics, the city has not improved—it has declined. Trash piles up across neighborhoods. Violent crime remains unaddressed. Housing code enforcement is uneven, and development projects continue to move forward with little to no community input. Meanwhile, candidates tied to the Rise Up Mount Vernon PAC—backed by developer dollars—are now positioned to shape the city’s future.
Plummer, who carries significant unresolved tax liabilities and maintains a private financial relationship with a developer-lender based in New Rochelle, isn’t just participating in politics—he appears to be orchestrating outcomes. Which begs a fundamental question: Who is Mount Vernon being developed for—its people, or the financiers and interests backing its political operators?
Why This Matters
Kenny Plummer currently serves as a District Leader in Mount Vernon, a position of political influence in the local Democratic Party. He has played a public role in endorsing candidates and guiding campaign strategy, and is directly linked to the Rise Up Mount Vernon PAC—a political action committee that has accepted sizable donations from development-connected entities. One poll site worker referred to him as “the boss,” underscoring the perception of his influence.
Recently uncovered documents show that Plummer took out a mortgage with PMP Lending LLC, a company affiliated with a developer firm operating in New Rochelle. That mortgage secures not only the property itself, but also rental income, insurance payouts, and renovation contracts—suggesting a deep financial relationship. When combined with over $69,000 in unresolved federal tax liens, this creates a picture of a political figure under substantial private financial obligation.
If that developer-lender has interests in projects or influence within Mount Vernon, and if Plummer is guiding which candidates are supported and how campaign resources are distributed, this raises serious ethical concerns and the appearance of a conflict of interest. The public has a right to know whether city politics are being influenced by outside financial actors or undisclosed debts.
Possible Legal and Ethical Violations
The findings in these documents raise potential violations under state and federal law, including:
- New York Public Officers Law § 74 (Code of Ethics): Prohibits public officials or political leaders from engaging in actions where financial interests may conflict with public duty.
- New York Election Law §§ 14-126 and 17-152: Addresses illegal coordination between PACs and candidates, as well as improper campaign financing.
- 18 U.S. Code § 1346 (Federal Honest Services Fraud): Prohibits schemes that deprive the public of honest services by way of undisclosed financial entanglements.
- 26 U.S. Code § 7201: Criminalizes willful tax evasion or concealment of federal tax obligations.
If Plummer failed to disclose his financial relationship with PMP Lending, his federal tax liabilities, or any material benefits while engaging in campaign endorsements or political organizing, he may be subject to ethics complaints, civil penalties, or even formal investigation.
Complaint Filed with JCOPE: Residency, Lobbying, and Ethics
A formal complaint has been submitted to the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics (JCOPE) against Plummer, alleging multiple violations of state law. The complaint asserts that Plummer no longer resides in Mount Vernon—potentially violating Public Officers Law § 3 and Election Law § 2-110, which require residency for holding political office.
It also alleges that Plummer has engaged in unregistered lobbying activity, including arranging a $25,000 developer contribution to the Rise Up PAC—possibly violating the Lobbying Act. This echoes his prior history: in 2012, JCOPE found Plummer guilty of failing to register lobbying activity on behalf of developers through his firm, DiRA Consulting. He admitted the violation and paid a fine.
Taken together, these allegations point to a repeated pattern of political activity entangled with private developer interests, raising serious concerns about transparency and the integrity of local governance.
A Pattern of Silence
Despite mounting concerns and documented evidence, Mount Vernon’s Democratic leadership has remained publicly silent. To date, only one Democratic-endorsed official—City Comptroller Darren Morton—has denounced the Rise Up Mount Vernon PAC. Other candidates who have benefited from PAC funding have yet to respond to questions about Plummer’s role or disclose whether they were aware of his financial entanglements.
This silence is more than political caution—it suggests a broader culture of unaccountability within the local party structure. When financial influence goes unchecked and ethical boundaries are blurred, public trust is eroded, and the political process becomes compromised.
The Public Deserves Answers
Mount Vernon residents deserve to know the full scope of Kenny Plummer’s financial relationships—especially if those relationships influence who gets elected, how money flows through campaigns, and which developers benefit from city contracts.
This is no longer a partisan issue. It is a matter of ethical leadership, legal compliance, and public accountability. Mount Vernon cannot afford to let private interests dictate public outcomes.
Black Westchester Magazine will continue to follow this developing story and report on new findings as they emerge.
