When politicians announce trade deals, they typically speak in grand, abstract terms—“historic,” “groundbreaking,” “mutually beneficial.” But as with most government actions, the rhetoric rarely aligns with results. President Trump’s newly announced trade agreement with the United Kingdom is no exception. The only question that matters is this: What are the actual consequences for working-class Black Americans?
To answer that, we must strip away the sentiment and examine the incentives, trade-offs, and downstream effects—because good intentions do not guarantee good outcomes.
Lower Tariffs—Who Benefits?
The centerpiece of this trade deal is a reduction in tariffs on British exports—steel, aluminum, and automobiles. Advocates say it will help consumers by lowering prices, but that narrative conveniently ignores the other side of the equation: American producers, especially in the industrial heartlands where Black workers still depend on manufacturing jobs to feed their families and build a future. Cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago are filled with skilled Black welders, machinists, and auto workers—people whose livelihoods are directly threatened by this type of policy.
So what does tariff relief really mean? It means foreign goods undercutting American-made products once again. It means rewarding consumption over production. We are right back to where we were when Bill Clinton championed NAFTA and Barack Obama pushed the Trans-Pacific Partnership—back to a time when the political elite sold off the backbone of working-class America for cheap goods and global prestige. This deal follows the same logic, just repackaged in a different political wrapper.
We’re watching America relapse into being a nation addicted to imports, acting like a consumer crackhead, while our own factories sit idle. That’s great news for British manufacturers and multinational retailers—but it’s a gut punch to Black communities that have already suffered the consequences of globalization without ever seeing the promised benefits.
And now the question becomes: How will Trump respond when the American auto sector starts to feel the sting? Is there a real plan to protect U.S. workers and reinvest in domestic industry—or was this just another bluff? If there’s no follow-through, then this isn’t about strengthening America—it’s about repeating history. And we already know how that ends: with the working class, especially Black America, left holding the bag.
The Digital Tax Distraction
The deal includes a promise from the UK to reevaluate its digital services tax, which hits U.S. tech giants like Amazon and Meta. The usual narrative is that this move will “strengthen innovation.” But again, whose innovation?
None of this addresses the reality that Black tech entrepreneurs remain shut out of access to venture capital, global partnerships, and platform dominance. Cutting taxes for Big Tech may help their stock price, but it does nothing to close the digital divide or build a Black digital economy. Without deliberate inclusion, the benefits flow up the ladder—not across or down.
Agriculture and Food Quality—A Market Signal
The UK held its line against importing U.S. agricultural products like hormone-treated beef and chlorine-washed chicken. British regulators see them as low-quality, high-risk. Meanwhile, those same products flood American grocery stores, especially in low-income, predominantly Black communities.
The implication is clear: The very foods other countries won’t feed their citizens are being sold to us. That’s not racism—it’s market logic. If there’s a segment of the population that doesn’t push back, they will be the dumping ground for what others reject. Until there’s a market response—like community-supported agriculture, co-ops, and support for Black farmers—there’s no incentive for that to change.
Trade Without Infrastructure Is Just Optics
In theory, free trade opens opportunities for exports, business expansion, and job growth. But in practice, that only happens when domestic businesses are positioned to take advantage of new markets. Black-owned businesses are rarely in that position. We lack access to capital, international logistics, export knowledge, and federal contract access. So, a trade deal—no matter how large—is meaningless without a local economic base that can plug into it.
This is where the real policy failure lies. No trade deal will lift Black America without prior investment in the skills, capital access, and enterprise systems that allow us to compete. A door being open means nothing if you don’t have the shoes to walk through it.
If the UK deal results in lower prices for a handful of consumer goods, it may be marginally helpful to the average households. But if it also accelerates job loss in Black industrial hubs, increases reliance on unhealthy food imports, and deepens our absence from the global economy, then its net effect is negative.
Economic policy must be measured not by how it sounds on cable news—but by whether it changes the conditions on the ground for ordinary people. Black America must ask: are we players in this trade—or are we just spectators?
?
