Eric Adams has devoted decades to public service — from his years as an NYPD officer fighting for reform inside the department, to his time as Brooklyn Borough President, and now as mayor of the nation’s largest city. That long record of service deserves respect. While it is important to appreciate his contributions and intent to address the city’s challenges, respect for a man’s past cannot blind us to the reality of his present. With poll numbers hovering between 7 and 10 percent and a plague of alleged corruption hanging over his administration, Adams’s decision to stay in the 2025 mayoral race raises tough questions about leadership, accountability, and the future of New York City.
Polls Don’t Lie
Campaigns live or die on momentum, and the numbers show Adams’s support has collapsed. In 2021, he was swept into office as the candidate of experience and order. Today, he trails badly behind Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo, and even Curtis Sliwa. For a city of eight million people, a base of single-digit support is not a foundation for victory — it’s a warning sign. However, Adams’s ongoing efforts demonstrate his continued commitment to public service. Combine that with the drumbeat of investigations and allegations, and it’s no wonder voters are signaling they are ready to move on.
Between Service and Scandal
No one can deny Adams’s resilience. His life story — a working-class kid from Queens rising through the ranks to the mayoralty — is inspiring. Resilience has enabled him to focus on reform and city improvement despite being surrounded by distractions. Yet, resilience cannot erase the distractions created by a steady stream of alleged misconduct tied to his administration. What should have been a term focused on reform and results has too often been consumed by press conferences denying wrongdoing. Pushing forward in a race with little path to success risks turning a legacy of service into a cautionary tale of how scandal overshadows substance.
A Plague of Alleged Corruption
A cloud of alleged corruption has taken Adams off his path and turned his mayoralty into a distraction. Despite these challenges, Adams has continued to work on key city issues. Instead of steady leadership, headlines about investigations and scandals have overshadowed policy and progress. Meanwhile, the city still faces urgent challenges: housing affordability, crime, migrant integration, and budget shortfalls. The people who once placed their trust in Adams deserve a mayor fully focused on governance, not one consumed by defending himself and a struggling campaign.
The Party Problem
Adams’s decline is not isolated; it reflects the New York Democratic Party’s historical treatment of strong Black leaders. Since entering the Senate, Adams was seen as an outsider, never fully supported by the party. His administration’s issues are similar to those of past mayors. The difference is that others received political cover, while Adams faced harsher standards and less support. This hostility reflects party politics as much as performance.
A Final Word
Eric Adams has earned a place in New York’s public service history. But history will also judge whether he knew when to step aside. Leadership means knowing which battles to fight—and when stepping away best serves those you vowed to protect.
If Adams wants his legacy defined by service instead of scandal and party rejection, he needs to consider not just what he could lose, but what the city could gain by moving forward. Ultimately, his long-standing commitment to public service should remain a central part of how his leadership is remembered.
